|
For further resources about the WSSD see
below . See the post-WSSD
commentary by Victor Menotti, director of IFG'S Environment
Program.
A brief overview
On August 26th to September 4th, 2002, the United Nations (UN) World
Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD)met in Johannesburg, South
Africa. This ten-year retrospective of the 1992 Rio +10 summit was
designed to "seek consensus on the general assessment of current conditions,
and on priorities for further action in new areas or issues." UN planning
sessions for the summit made it clear that the WSSD was not addressing
in any substantial way the number one threat to the survival of the
natural world - economic globalization.
A decade after the Rio Earth Summit there is nearly unanimous agreement
among participating countries and organizations that the outcome
has been a failure. The Rio processes have not achieved any of their
goals, and some of the most notable undertakings, as in the area
of climate change, have been profoundly disappointing.
Mohammed Al-Ashry, chairman of the Global Environmental Facility
(GEF), the body charged with overseeing Rio's goals and agreements,
freely acknowledged the failures, saying they are rooted in a lack
of "political will to pursue sustainable development at the level
that was required to reverse past trends." But such statements miss
a fundamental point: as long as global institutions and national
governments simultaneously attempt to pursue economic globalization,
no goals for a healthy planet, or equity and justice for people,
are remotely achievable. Globalization, trade and investment designs
and structures reinforce a model of development - centered on free
trade, hyper economic growth, and export-oriented production - which
is inherently unsustainable in ecological and social terms. They
also destroy viable localized and regional systems that may have
the greatest long-term promise for future sustainability.
Bureaucracies such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), the World
Bank, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and agreements
such as the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), are
the driving engines for the global economy. They are increasingly
making the work of the Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs),
including the products of Rio, irrelevant and subordinate to global
trade and investment rules.
The directives and enforcement mechanisms of the WTO, and other
trade and investment bodies, are invariably biased toward market
principles. They favor free trade and a deregulation process that
promotes maximum freedom for global corporations to exploit the
planet's last remaining resources without regard to environmental
consequences to water, soil, air, other natural resources, the atmosphere
or human communities. Wherever there have been efforts by nation-states
or regional governments to exercise some control on corporations
they have been routinely overpowered by the rulings of the WTO and
other bodies. As a result, governments that have joined both the
globalization process, and the UN Rio processes, are finding it
impossible to serve both masters. Instead, they choose globalization
with all that it brings.
While it was wonderful that Rio + 10 attempted to breathe new life
into its basic agreements its chances for long-term success are
next to nil if nations remain caught in the present double-bind,
which prevents even those willing to act on behalf of nature from
doing so. The root causes of the present global environmental malaise
do not only reflect a failure of "political will," they are also
caused by a fundamental loss of national powers to operate in the
best interests of nature or human beings. The activities of the
IFG in the meetings in Johannesburg August and September, 2002,
were focussed on an attempt to reveal this problem to as wide an
audience as possible.
For more information about events related to the WSSD go to
our events page.
For analysis and reporting please refer to the lnks below:
- Read a paper prepared by Third
World Network entitled Why
Trade and Finance Groups Should Get Involved in the WSSD Process..
- See Friends of the Earth International's position paper entitled
Towards
Binding Corporate Accountability.
- Download the Draft
Plan of Implementation for the World Summit on Sustainable Development.
(This is a pdf file)
- Download IFG co-Director Debi Barker's article, that appeared
in the July/August 2002 issue of Tikkun Magazine, A
Decade After the First Earth Summit, There is Little to Celebrate.
(This is a pdf file)
- Download Friends of the Earth International's Comment
Paper sent to Professor Emil Salim, Chairman of WSSD,
in response to his Chairman's paper which was released May 9th.
(This is a pdf file)
- Much in-depth information can be found at the
UN website for the summit and the
Rio Plus 10 website.
- View the Dialogue
Paper by Indigenous People prepared by the Members
of the CSD Indigenous Peoples's Caucus invited as an organizing
partner of the Dialogue Segment, for indigenous people.
- See Environmental
Justice for All - Even Tuvalu! by the Sierra Club's
Michael Dorsey, first printed in Outreach (a daily publication
from the Stakeholder Forum, at the fourth preparatory meeting
for the WSSD).
- View The
Battle of Bali, a report by Third
World Network researcher Yin Shao Loong about the fourth
preparatory committee meeting for the WSSD.
- Go to a segment of BRIDGES Weekly Trade News Digest, Vol. 2,
No.11, entitled: WSSD
Prepcom Fails on Trade, Some Progress on Fisheries and MEAs.
- To see a paper by Victor Menotti, the IFG's environment project
director, go to his article From
Doha to Johannesburg. Also read his paper Exporting
Enron Environmentalism: The Bush Vision for Johannesburg.
- View the African Civil Society's Declaration on the New Partnership
for Africa's Development (NEPAD), NEPAD:
We Do Not Accept NEPAD!! Africa Is Not For Sale!!
- Read an article by Patrick Bond of the National Institute for
Economic Policy on NEPAD
from the ZNet Sustainer Program.
- See Declaration
on Africa's Development Challenges and Reflections on the New
Economic Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD)
by the Council for Development and Social Science Research in
Africa, based in Dakar, and Third World Network - Africa.
- Read an article by Odour Ongwen on New
Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD): Planting Sterile
Seeds.
- View an article by the Wildlife and Environment Society (WESSA)
on The Environment
and NEPAD.
- Read the Heinrich Boll Foundation's Jo'burg
Memo - Fairness in a Fragile World: A Memorandum for the World
Summit on Sustainable Development.
- Read NEPAD:
Foothold for Corporate Globalization in Africa by Antonia
Juhasz, project director for the IFG.
- See the calendar
of events happening before and during the WSSD meeting
in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Further Information on the UN:
Back to Events
Page
Back to Home Page
|